EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.AUTHORIZED OFFICER DEEPAK CHANDRAKANT PATEL vs RAWAL HITESH VEESARAM — 164/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJSR120003752026
Filing Number
164/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
164/2026
Registration Date
09-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHOR
Judge
2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.AUTHORIZED OFFICER DEEPAK CHANDRAKANT PATEL
Adv. G V VEKARIYA
Respondent(s)
RAWAL HITESH VEESARAM
ANITA HOTESH RAWAL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CRMAJ 164/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kathor (Surat) granted Equitas Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a mortgaged residential property (Flat A-201, Dadabhagvan Residency, Kamrej, Surat) from borrowers Rawal Hitesh Veesaram and Anita Hitesh Rawal. Key Reasoning: The court found that the bank satisfied all statutory requirements: valid security interest, borrower default, proper notice under Section 13(2), and compliance with SARFAESI procedures. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute possession and directed the bank to deposit ₹15,000 toward commissioner expenses within one month, with possession to be completed within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CRMAJ 164/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kathor (Surat) granted Equitas Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a mortgaged residential property (Flat A-201, Dadabhagvan Residency, Kamrej, Surat) from borrowers Rawal Hitesh Veesaram and Anita Hitesh Rawal. Key Reasoning: The court found that the bank satisfied all statutory requirements: valid security interest, borrower default, proper notice under Section 13(2), and compliance with SARFAESI procedures. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute possession and directed the bank to deposit ₹15,000 toward commissioner expenses within one month, with possession to be completed within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts