EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.AUTHORIZED OFFICER DEEPAK CHANDRAKANT PATEL vs SAIKH MOHAMMAD JABIR S/O HADIZULLA — 163/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSR120003742026

Case disposed

Filing Number

163/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

163/2026

Registration Date

09-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KATHOR

Judge

2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.AUTHORIZED OFFICER DEEPAK CHANDRAKANT PATEL

Adv. G V VEKARIYA

Respondent(s)

SAIKH MOHAMMAD JABIR S/O HADIZULLA

SAIKH RABIYA MOHAMAD JABIR

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

13-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: CRMAJ No. 163/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kathor (Surat) allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The bank proved that borrowers defaulted on their loan obligation, the account was classified as non-performing asset, and statutory 60-day notice under Section 13(2) was served. The court appointed a commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged flat (Flat 103, Hare Krishna Palace, Kadodara, Surat) and forward it to the bank, with the bank bearing all expenses and providing police protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMAJ No. 163/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kathor (Surat) allowed Equitas Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The bank proved that borrowers defaulted on their loan obligation, the account was classified as non-performing asset, and statutory 60-day notice under Section 13(2) was served. The court appointed a commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged flat (Flat 103, Hare Krishna Palace, Kadodara, Surat) and forward it to the bank, with the bank bearing all expenses and providing police protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KATHOR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case