EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.AUTHORIZED OFFICER DEEPAK CHANDRAKANT PATEL vs RAJU RAMESH BHALERAO — 160/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSR120003712026

Filing Number

160/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

160/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KATHOR

Judge

2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 31-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.EQUITAS SMALL FINANCE BANK LTD.AUTHORIZED OFFICER DEEPAK CHANDRAKANT PATEL

    Adv. G V VEKARIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJU RAMESH BHALERAO

  2. 2.SARASWATI RAJUBHAI BHALERAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CRMAJ No. 160/2026 Court Decision: Equitas Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 was ALLOWED. The court authorized a Court Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged property (Plot No. 368, Radhika Residency, Kareli, Palsana, Surat) and forward it to the bank. The court found the bank satisfied all statutory requirements, including serving notice to defaulting borrowers Raju Ramesh Bhalerao and Saraswati Raju Bhalerav, and complied with SARFAESI procedures for securing assets. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 160/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMAJ No. 160/2026 Court Decision: Equitas Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 was ALLOWED. The court authorized a Court Commissioner to take possession of the mortgaged property (Plot No. 368, Radhika Residency, Kareli, Palsana, Surat) and forward it to the bank. The court found the bank satisfied all statutory requirements, including serving notice to defaulting borrowers Raju Ramesh Bhalerao and Saraswati Raju Bhalerav, and complied with SARFAESI procedures for securing assets. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case