ADITYA BIRLA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AUTHORIZED OFFICER PATIL YOGESH RAJENDRABHAI vs GNANESHWAR EKNATHBHAI MARATHE — 138/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSR120002822026

Filing Number

138/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

138/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KATHOR

Judge

2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ADITYA BIRLA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AUTHORIZED OFFICER PATIL YOGESH RAJENDRABHAI

    Adv. V B PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GNANESHWAR EKNATHBHAI MARATHE

  2. 2.SUNANDABEN GNANESHVAR MARATHE

  3. 3.RAMESHKUMAR SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kathor, Surat, allowed Aditya Birla Housing Finance Ltd.'s application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, granting the bank authority to take possession of a mortgaged residential property (Plot No. 173, Yashvi Residency 2, Kareli Palsana, Surat) from the defaulting borrowers. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the possession order and directed the borrowers to pay court expenses within specified timelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 138/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kathor, Surat, allowed Aditya Birla Housing Finance Ltd.'s application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, granting the bank authority to take possession of a mortgaged residential property (Plot No. 173, Yashvi Residency 2, Kareli Palsana, Surat) from the defaulting borrowers. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the possession order and directed the borrowers to pay court expenses within specified timelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case