ADITYA BIRLA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AUTHORIZED OFFICER PATIL YOGESH RAJENDRABHAI vs GNANESHWAR EKNATHBHAI MARATHE — 138/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSR120002822026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

138/2026

Filing Date

31-01-2026

Registration No

138/2026

Registration Date

31-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KATHOR

Judge

2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 Section 14,

Petitioner(s)

ADITYA BIRLA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AUTHORIZED OFFICER PATIL YOGESH RAJENDRABHAI

Adv. V B PATIL

Respondent(s)

GNANESHWAR EKNATHBHAI MARATHE

SUNANDABEN GNANESHVAR MARATHE

RAMESHKUMAR SINGH

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

07-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kathor, Surat, allowed Aditya Birla Housing Finance Ltd.'s application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, granting the bank authority to take possession of a mortgaged residential property (Plot No. 173, Yashvi Residency 2, Kareli Palsana, Surat) from the defaulting borrowers. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the possession order and directed the borrowers to pay court expenses within specified timelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kathor, Surat, allowed Aditya Birla Housing Finance Ltd.'s application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, granting the bank authority to take possession of a mortgaged residential property (Plot No. 173, Yashvi Residency 2, Kareli Palsana, Surat) from the defaulting borrowers. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to execute the possession order and directed the borrowers to pay court expenses within specified timelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KATHOR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case