HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AUTHORIZED OFFICER NITIN SAMUDRE vs RAJEEV KUMAR THAKUR — 131/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJSR120002752026
Filing Number
131/2026
Filing Date
31-Jan-2026
Registration No
131/2026
Registration Date
31-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, KATHOR
Judge
2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
07-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AUTHORIZED OFFICER NITIN SAMUDRE
Adv. H D MORADIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJEEV KUMAR THAKUR
-
2.JYOTI THAKUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kathor (Surat) allowed Hinduja Housing Finance Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a residential flat mortgaged by borrowers Rajeev Kumar Thakur and Jyoti Thakur who defaulted on their loan. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset (Flat No. 107, Krushnam Residency, Surat) and directed the borrowers' property be handed over to the financial institution after proper inventory, with the applicant bearing all associated expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
31-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 131/2026
Court Decision Summary The Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kathor (Surat) allowed Hinduja Housing Finance Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a residential flat mortgaged by borrowers Rajeev Kumar Thakur and Jyoti Thakur who defaulted on their loan. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset (Flat No. 107, Krushnam Residency, Surat) and directed the borrowers' property be handed over to the financial institution after proper inventory, with the applicant bearing all associated expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts