HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AUTHORIZED OFFICER NITIN SAMUDRE vs BHOLANATH UPADHYAY — 128/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSR120002722026

Filing Number

128/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

128/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KATHOR

Judge

2-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HINDUJA HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED AUTHORIZED OFFICER NITIN SAMUDRE

    Adv. H D MORADIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHOLANATH UPADHYAY

  2. 2.VANDNA UPADHYAY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kathor, District Surat, allowed Hinduja Housing Finance Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and authorized possession of a residential flat (Flat No. 207, Devi Residency) mortgaged by defaulting borrowers Bholanath and Vandna Upadhyay. The court appointed a Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset and forward it to the lender, finding that all statutory requirements under SARFAESI were satisfied including proper notice and compliance with procedural safeguards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 128/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Kathor, District Surat, allowed Hinduja Housing Finance Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and authorized possession of a residential flat (Flat No. 207, Devi Residency) mortgaged by defaulting borrowers Bholanath and Vandna Upadhyay. The court appointed a Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset and forward it to the lender, finding that all statutory requirements under SARFAESI were satisfied including proper notice and compliance with procedural safeguards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case