Government of Gujarat vs AVINASHBHAI UKKALBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H G VASAVA — 469/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR100005312025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
469/2025
Filing Date
20-08-2025
Registration No
469/2025
Registration Date
20-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214002250163
Police Station
UMARPADA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
AVINASHBHAI UKKALBHAI VASAVA Advocate - H G VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 23-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 13-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge & J.M.F.C. Court, Umarpada (Surat) acquitted the accused Avinashbhai Ukkalbhai Vasava of charges under IPC Section 281 (rash/negligent driving). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence—particularly the panchnama (witness statement) and police investigation—lacked proper corroboration and independent witness support required under Indian Evidence Act Sections 104-105. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge & J.M.F.C. Court, Umarpada (Surat) acquitted the accused Avinashbhai Ukkalbhai Vasava of charges under IPC Section 281 (rash/negligent driving). The court found that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence—particularly the panchnama (witness statement) and police investigation—lacked proper corroboration and independent witness support required under Indian Evidence Act Sections 104-105. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts