STATE OF GUJARAT vs VIPULBHAI RAMESHBHAI DUDHAT Advocate - A L VASAVA — 352/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,304(A),. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR100004492024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
352/2024
Filing Date
05-09-2024
Registration No
352/2024
Registration Date
05-09-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
152
Police Station
UMARPADA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VIPULBHAI RAMESHBHAI DUDHAT Advocate - A L VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 24-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 06-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 06-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Umarpada (Surat) acquitted the accused, Vipulbhai Rameshbhai Dhudat, of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, 304(a), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving in a rash and negligent manner causing the fatal accident; mere high speed alone is insufficient without proof of the manner of driving being criminal rashness or negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Umarpada (Surat) acquitted the accused, Vipulbhai Rameshbhai Dhudat, of charges under IPC Sections 279, 337, 338, 304(a), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving in a rash and negligent manner causing the fatal accident; mere high speed alone is insufficient without proof of the manner of driving being criminal rashness or negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts