STATE OF GUJARAT vs DINESHBHAI S/OBASTIMAL KASTURCHAND LUHAR Advocate - R C VASAVA — 316/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,457,114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR100003942024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
316/2024
Filing Date
18-07-2024
Registration No
316/2024
Registration Date
18-07-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
202
Police Station
UMARPADA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DINESHBHAI S/OBASTIMAL KASTURCHAND LUHAR Advocate - R C VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 21-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Umarpada (Surat) acquitted both accused in a theft case (FIR No. 316/2024) for lack of sufficient evidence. The court found that prosecution failed to establish the crime beyond reasonable doubt, as confessions made to police officers are inadmissible under Indian Evidence Act Section 25, and no independent corroborating evidence was produced to connect the accused to the alleged Rs. 3.8 lakh theft from a petrol pump. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Umarpada (Surat) acquitted both accused in a theft case (FIR No. 316/2024) for lack of sufficient evidence. The court found that prosecution failed to establish the crime beyond reasonable doubt, as confessions made to police officers are inadmissible under Indian Evidence Act Section 25, and no independent corroborating evidence was produced to connect the accused to the alleged Rs. 3.8 lakh theft from a petrol pump. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts