STATE OF GUJARAT vs DINESHBHAI S/OBASTIMAL KASTURCHAND LUHAR Advocate - R C VASAVA — 316/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 380,457,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR100003942024

Filing Number

316/2024

Filing Date

18-Jul-2024

Registration No

316/2024

Registration Date

18-Jul-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

202

Police Station

UMARPADA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 380,457,114
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DINESHBHAI S/OBASTIMAL KASTURCHAND LUHAR Advocate - R C VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Umarpada (Surat) acquitted both accused in a theft case (FIR No. 316/2024) for lack of sufficient evidence. The court found that prosecution failed to establish the crime beyond reasonable doubt, as confessions made to police officers are inadmissible under Indian Evidence Act Section 25, and no independent corroborating evidence was produced to connect the accused to the alleged Rs. 3.8 lakh theft from a petrol pump. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 22-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 06-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 11-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 26-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 07-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 10-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 30-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 21-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 03-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 12-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 31-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 18-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 316/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Umarpada (Surat) acquitted both accused in a theft case (FIR No. 316/2024) for lack of sufficient evidence. The court found that prosecution failed to establish the crime beyond reasonable doubt, as confessions made to police officers are inadmissible under Indian Evidence Act Section 25, and no independent corroborating evidence was produced to connect the accused to the alleged Rs. 3.8 lakh theft from a petrol pump. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case