SUNITABEN UMESHBHAI VASAVA vs RAMESHBHAI SURAPSINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S N VASAVA — 21/2025
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 18,19,20,22,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJSR100001942025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
21/2025
Filing Date
08-04-2025
Registration No
21/2025
Registration Date
08-04-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUNITABEN UMESHBHAI VASAVA
Adv. D F VASAVA
SUHASANA RAMESHBHAI VASAVA
Adv. D F VASAVA
HARSHIKABEN RAMESHBHAI VASAVA
Adv. D F VASAVA
Respondent(s)
RAMESHBHAI SURAPSINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S N VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
ORDER/JUDGEMENT
FINAL HEARING
EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 13-02-2026 | ORDER/JUDGEMENT | |
| 28-01-2026 | FINAL HEARING | |
| 16-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court partially granted the petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the respondent (husband) subjected the petitioner (wife) to domestic violence—both physical and mental abuse—and ordered him to: (1) provide monthly maintenance of ₹5,000 to the petitioner and ₹1,000 each to their two daughters; (2) pay ₹1,00,000 as compensation for past suffering; and (3) cease all acts of domestic violence while ensuring the petitioner's safe residence. However, the court rejected some of the petitioner's claims due to lack of sufficient corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court partially granted the petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the respondent (husband) subjected the petitioner (wife) to domestic violence—both physical and mental abuse—and ordered him to: (1) provide monthly maintenance of ₹5,000 to the petitioner and ₹1,000 each to their two daughters; (2) pay ₹1,00,000 as compensation for past suffering; and (3) cease all acts of domestic violence while ensuring the petitioner's safe residence. However, the court rejected some of the petitioner's claims due to lack of sufficient corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts