SUNITABEN UMESHBHAI VASAVA vs RAMESHBHAI SURAPSINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S N VASAVA — 21/2025

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 18,19,20,22. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSR100001942025

Filing Number

21/2025

Filing Date

08-Apr-2025

Registration No

21/2025

Registration Date

08-Apr-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 18,19,20,22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNITABEN UMESHBHAI VASAVA

    Adv. D F VASAVA

  2. 2.SUHASANA RAMESHBHAI VASAVA

    Adv. D F VASAVA

  3. 3.HARSHIKABEN RAMESHBHAI VASAVA

    Adv. D F VASAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI SURAPSINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S N VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court partially granted the petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the respondent (husband) subjected the petitioner (wife) to domestic violence—both physical and mental abuse—and ordered him to: (1) provide monthly maintenance of ₹5,000 to the petitioner and ₹1,000 each to their two daughters; (2) pay ₹1,00,000 as compensation for past suffering; and (3) cease all acts of domestic violence while ensuring the petitioner's safe residence. However, the court rejected some of the petitioner's claims due to lack of sufficient corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Order/Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Final Hearing

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 30-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 15-Sep-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 22-Aug-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 23-Jul-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 21-Jun-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 03-Jun-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 13-May-2025

    Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 29-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 08-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 21/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court partially granted the petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The court found that the respondent (husband) subjected the petitioner (wife) to domestic violence—both physical and mental abuse—and ordered him to: (1) provide monthly maintenance of ₹5,000 to the petitioner and ₹1,000 each to their two daughters; (2) pay ₹1,00,000 as compensation for past suffering; and (3) cease all acts of domestic violence while ensuring the petitioner's safe residence. However, the court rejected some of the petitioner's claims due to lack of sufficient corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case