Government of Gujarat vs ZAVERBHAI BHIMSINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S R VASAVA — 131/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR100001362026

Filing Number

131/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

131/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ZAVERBHAI BHIMSINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S R VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Principal Civil Judge's Court in Umarpada, Surat convicted the accused Jherabbai Bhimsinghbhai under Section 66-1-B of the Prohibition Act for voluntarily confessing to the crime, considering his economic hardship as a sole earner and his remorse. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of Rs. 200 (in default, 2 days simple imprisonment), applying principles of judicial discretion to award minimal punishment based on sufficient and reasonable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 131/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Civil Judge's Court in Umarpada, Surat convicted the accused Jherabbai Bhimsinghbhai under Section 66-1-B of the Prohibition Act for voluntarily confessing to the crime, considering his economic hardship as a sole earner and his remorse. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment until the rising of the court and imposed a fine of Rs. 200 (in default, 2 days simple imprisonment), applying principles of judicial discretion to award minimal punishment based on sufficient and reasonable grounds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case