Government of Gujarat vs DIGVIJAYKUMAR DINESHBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S R VASAVA — 128/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR100001332026

Filing Number

128/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

128/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85,66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIGVIJAYKUMAR DINESHBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S R VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Principal Civil Court of Umarpada (Surat District) convicted the accused, Digvijay Kumar Dineshbhai, under Section 66-1-B of the relevant statute for committing a simple offense. Considering the accused's poor financial condition, his voluntary confession, lack of prior criminal record, and assurance against future crimes, the court imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment until the court rises and a fine of ₹200, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 128/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal Civil Court of Umarpada (Surat District) convicted the accused, Digvijay Kumar Dineshbhai, under Section 66-1-B of the relevant statute for committing a simple offense. Considering the accused's poor financial condition, his voluntary confession, lack of prior criminal record, and assurance against future crimes, the court imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment until the court rises and a fine of ₹200, with an alternative of 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case