Government of Gujarat vs YUSUF VORA Advocate - H G VASAVA — 120/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR100001252026

Filing Number

120/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

120/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.YUSUF VORA Advocate - H G VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Umarpada, Surat convicted defendant Imran Yusuf Vohra under Motor Vehicle Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B for driving under the influence without a valid permit. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 1,000 with an alternative simple imprisonment of 5 days if the fine remains unpaid, considering it the defendant's first offense and his poor financial condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 120/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class at Umarpada, Surat convicted defendant Imran Yusuf Vohra under Motor Vehicle Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B for driving under the influence without a valid permit. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 1,000 with an alternative simple imprisonment of 5 days if the fine remains unpaid, considering it the defendant's first offense and his poor financial condition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case