Government of Gujarat vs SHANKARBHAI TANKANIYABHAI VASAVA — 117/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR100001222026

Filing Number

117/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

117/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHANKARBHAI TANKANIYABHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Umarpada (Surat) convicted accused Shankarbhai Tankniabhai under Motor Vehicle Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(B) for driving without a valid license while under the influence of alcohol. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 1,000 with an alternative sentence of 5 days simple imprisonment, considering it the accused's first offense and his financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 117/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Umarpada (Surat) convicted accused Shankarbhai Tankniabhai under Motor Vehicle Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(B) for driving without a valid license while under the influence of alcohol. The court imposed a fine of Rs. 1,000 with an alternative sentence of 5 days simple imprisonment, considering it the accused's first offense and his financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case