STATE OF GUJARAT vs Deepak @ dips @ koliyo dineshbhai vasava Advocate - H G VASAVA — 82/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 392,341,114,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 17th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR100001172019
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
84/2019
Filing Date
09-10-2019
Registration No
82/2019
Registration Date
09-10-2019
Court
TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
18
Police Station
UMARPADA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Deepak @ dips @ koliyo dineshbhai vasava Advocate - H G VASAVA
Vikesh @ jashi ravidasbhai vasava
Rakesh @ sunil manharbhai vasava
Adv. A N VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 24-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 23-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 07-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC sections 302, 341, and 114 for the alleged robbery and murder case. The judgment held that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence relied primarily on confessions made to police officers, which are inadmissible under Indian Evidence Act sections 24-27, and no corroborating independent evidence was presented to prove the accusations against the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted all three accused of charges under IPC sections 302, 341, and 114 for the alleged robbery and murder case. The judgment held that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence relied primarily on confessions made to police officers, which are inadmissible under Indian Evidence Act sections 24-27, and no corroborating independent evidence was presented to prove the accusations against the defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts