Government of Gujarat vs RANJITBHAI GULABBHAI VASAVA — 86/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR100000912026

Filing Number

86/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

86/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANJITBHAI GULABBHAI VASAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Umarpada (Surat District) convicted the accused Ranjitbhai Gulabbhai for driving a motor vehicle without a valid permit while under the influence of alcohol, violating Motor Vehicle Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000 with an alternative imprisonment of 5 days, considering it his first offense and his plea for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Order

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 86/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Umarpada (Surat District) convicted the accused Ranjitbhai Gulabbhai for driving a motor vehicle without a valid permit while under the influence of alcohol, violating Motor Vehicle Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000 with an alternative imprisonment of 5 days, considering it his first offense and his plea for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case