Government of Gujarat vs DHANSUKHBHAI MAKANJIBHAI VASAVA Advocate - G D VASAVA — 58/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),351(3),352,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 04th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR100000632026
Filing Number
58/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
58/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214002250480
Police Station
UMARPADA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.DHANSUKHBHAI MAKANJIBHAI VASAVA Advocate - G D VASAVA
-
2.DHARMENDRABHAI DHANSUKHBHAI VASAVA
Adv. G D VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
SUMMARY The court acquitted both defendants (Dhansukhbhai Makanjibhai Vasava and Dharmendrabhai Dhansukhbhai Vasava) of charges under BNS sections 115(2), 351(3), 352, and 54, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant's testimony lacked corroborating evidence of the alleged beatings and abusive language, and defense cross-examination established only that normal conversation had occurred between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 58/2026
SUMMARY The court acquitted both defendants (Dhansukhbhai Makanjibhai Vasava and Dharmendrabhai Dhansukhbhai Vasava) of charges under BNS sections 115(2), 351(3), 352, and 54, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant's testimony lacked corroborating evidence of the alleged beatings and abusive language, and defense cross-examination established only that normal conversation had occurred between the parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts