Government of Gujarat vs ASMITBHAI MAHENDRABHAI VASAVA Advocate - J G VASAVA — 57/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR100000622026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
57/2026
Filing Date
16-02-2026
Registration No
57/2026
Registration Date
16-02-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214002250440
Police Station
UMARPADA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ASMITBHAI MAHENDRABHAI VASAVA Advocate - J G VASAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 18-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 19-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Principal Civil Judge & J.M.F.C. at Umarpada, Surat acquitted Asmitbhai Mahendrabhai Vasava of charges under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (rash/negligent driving) because the prosecution failed to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt. Both panch witnesses turned hostile and admitted signing the panchnama without reading it, while the investigating officer omitted critical details like vehicle speed and witness names from the complaint, undermining the prosecution's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Principal Civil Judge & J.M.F.C. at Umarpada, Surat acquitted Asmitbhai Mahendrabhai Vasava of charges under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (rash/negligent driving) because the prosecution failed to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt. Both panch witnesses turned hostile and admitted signing the panchnama without reading it, while the investigating officer omitted critical details like vehicle speed and witness names from the complaint, undermining the prosecution's credibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts