STATEM OF GUJARAT vs RAHULBHAI CHANDRASINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S R VASAVA — 20/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 118(1),352,351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR100000212025
Filing Number
20/2025
Filing Date
09-Jan-2025
Registration No
20/2025
Registration Date
09-Jan-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, UMARPADA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
376
Police Station
UMARPADA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATEM OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAHULBHAI CHANDRASINGBHAI VASAVA Advocate - S R VASAVA
-
2.JIGNESHBHAI CHANDRASINGBHAI VASAVA
-
3.VIKRAMBHAI GULABBHAI VASAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary of Court Decision The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Umarpada (Surat) acquitted three accused persons (Rahulbhai Chandrasingh Vasava, Jigneshbhai Chandrasingh Vasava, and Vikrambhai Gulabbhai Vasava) of charges under IPC sections 118(1), 352, 351(3), and 54 for allegedly assaulting the complainant with sticks and wooden planks on 01/09/2024. The court found that while the complainant's testimony indicated physical assault occurred, the prosecution failed to establish sufficient corroborating evidence through credible witness testimonies and medical records to prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, necessitating their acquittal under the principle that benefit of doubt must favor the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Jan-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 20/2025
Summary of Court Decision The Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Umarpada (Surat) acquitted three accused persons (Rahulbhai Chandrasingh Vasava, Jigneshbhai Chandrasingh Vasava, and Vikrambhai Gulabbhai Vasava) of charges under IPC sections 118(1), 352, 351(3), and 54 for allegedly assaulting the complainant with sticks and wooden planks on 01/09/2024. The court found that while the complainant's testimony indicated physical assault occurred, the prosecution failed to establish sufficient corroborating evidence through credible witness testimonies and medical records to prove the accused's guilt beyond reasonable doubt, necessitating their acquittal under the principle that benefit of doubt must favor the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts