VASU MANISHBHAI KAKDIYA AUTHORISED PERSON OF VASU INNOVATION vs PRABHAKAR HAREKSHNA NAYAKPRO. PRATIBHA SILK MILLA Advocate - D P JOGANI — 3399/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR090039572024

Filing Number

3399/2024

Filing Date

11-Dec-2024

Registration No

3399/2024

Registration Date

11-Dec-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, PALSANA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,141

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VASU MANISHBHAI KAKDIYA AUTHORISED PERSON OF VASU INNOVATION

    Adv. P D MANGUKIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRABHAKAR HAREKSHNA NAYAKPRO. PRATIBHA SILK MILLA Advocate - D P JOGANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary The court convicted the accused, Prabhakar Harkishnayan (proprietor of Pratibha Silk Mills), under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing three cheques totaling ₹1,46,170 that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The complainant had provided goods on credit, and despite a legal notice within 30 days of dishonor, the accused failed to pay. The court found the accused guilty as he could not rebut the statutory presumption under Sections 118-139 of the Act and sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment and a fine of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 18-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 06-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 26-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 06-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 29-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 08-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 21-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 27-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 30-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 05-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 17-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 10-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 10-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 11-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3399/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The court convicted the accused, Prabhakar Harkishnayan (proprietor of Pratibha Silk Mills), under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing three cheques totaling ₹1,46,170 that were dishonored due to insufficient funds. The complainant had provided goods on credit, and despite a legal notice within 30 days of dishonor, the accused failed to pay. The court found the accused guilty as he could not rebut the statutory presumption under Sections 118-139 of the Act and sentenced him to one year simple imprisonment and a fine of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case