Government of Gujarat vs GORAKH @ PINTU BHIMMRAV BADOGE (GADRI) Advocate - H G NAYKA — 2219/2019

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1B,65AE,116-2,81,98,99. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 20th June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR090022912019

Filing Number

2219/2019

Filing Date

07-Sep-2019

Registration No

2219/2019

Registration Date

07-Sep-2019

Court

TALUKA COURT, PALSANA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

20-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 05-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

5

Police Station

KADODARA GIDC POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2013

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1B,65AE,116-2,81,98,99

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GORAKH @ PINTU BHIMMRAV BADOGE (GADRI) Advocate - H G NAYKA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Jun-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court acquitted the accused Gorakh @ Pintu Bhimmrav Badoge (Gadri) of charges under the Prohibition Act (sections 66(1)B, 65E, 116(2), 81, 98, 99) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to substantiate its case through witness testimony and documentary evidence, particularly lacking technical expert verification and proper proof linking the seized contraband directly to the accused. The court found the prosecution's evidence inadequate to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused with bail provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 30-May-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 21-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 06-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 24-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 01-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 13-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 20-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 05-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 15-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 13-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 18-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 01-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 20-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 06-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 31-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 29-Apr-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 28-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 27-Feb-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 31-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 01-Jan-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 05-Dec-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 25-Oct-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 23-Sep-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 21-Aug-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 17-Jul-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 08-Jun-2023

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 15-May-2023

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  47. 17-Apr-2023

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  48. 27-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  49. 02-Mar-2023

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  50. 08-Feb-2023

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  51. 12-Jan-2023

    Process To Accused

    2Nd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC

  52. 20-Dec-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 25-Nov-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 03-Nov-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 06-Oct-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  56. 15-Sep-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  57. 24-Aug-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  58. 27-Jul-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  59. 28-Jun-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  60. 30-May-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  61. 18-Apr-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  62. 11-Mar-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  63. 06-Jan-2022

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  64. 25-Nov-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  65. 01-Oct-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  66. 22-Jul-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  67. 21-May-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  68. 19-Mar-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  69. 22-Jan-2021

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  70. 04-Dec-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  71. 14-Oct-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  72. 02-Sep-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  73. 20-Jul-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  74. 18-May-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  75. 11-Mar-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  76. 02-Jan-2020

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  77. 06-Nov-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  78. 07-Sep-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2219/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused Gorakh @ Pintu Bhimmrav Badoge (Gadri) of charges under the Prohibition Act (sections 66(1)B, 65E, 116(2), 81, 98, 99) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to substantiate its case through witness testimony and documentary evidence, particularly lacking technical expert verification and proper proof linking the seized contraband directly to the accused. The court found the prosecution's evidence inadequate to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and discharged the accused with bail provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case