Government of Gujarat vs SHIVLOKSING SHANTIBHUSARSING RATHVA Advocate - A R BHOI — 1955/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 454,457,380. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR090022732023
Filing Number
1955/2023
Filing Date
01-Aug-2023
Registration No
1955/2023
Registration Date
01-Aug-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, PALSANA
Judge
2-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 31-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214046230147
Police Station
PALSANA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHIVLOKSING SHANTIBHUSARSING RATHVA Advocate - A R BHOI
-
2.CHANDRABHANSING NATTHU VARMA
Adv. A B DHIMMAR
-
3.SHUBHAM RAMSVARUP PATEL
-
4.SHIVKUMAR ASHARAM PATEL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: 1955/2023 Court Decision: All four accused—Shivloksing Shantibhusarsing Rathva, Chandrabhansing Natthu Varma, Shubham Ramsvarup Patel, and Shikumar Ashaaram Patel—were acquitted of theft charges under IPC sections 454, 457, and 380. The court found insufficient evidence linking the accused to the alleged factory theft despite recovery of materials from their possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Feb-2026
Judgement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Aug-2024
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jul-2024
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jun-2024
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-May-2024
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
15-Apr-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Mar-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Feb-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jan-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Nov-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Oct-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Sep-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1955/2023
Case Summary: 1955/2023 Court Decision: All four accused—Shivloksing Shantibhusarsing Rathva, Chandrabhansing Natthu Varma, Shubham Ramsvarup Patel, and Shikumar Ashaaram Patel—were acquitted of theft charges under IPC sections 454, 457, and 380. The court found insufficient evidence linking the accused to the alleged factory theft despite recovery of materials from their possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts