BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS THROUGH SHRI DHANRAJ KARAD vs SUCHI INDUSTRIES LIMITED Advocate - A M BHATHENA — 1882/2024
Case under Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 Section 17(1),17(2),17(3). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR090022272024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1882/2024
Filing Date
20-07-2024
Registration No
1882/2024
Registration Date
20-07-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, PALSANA
Judge
2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS THROUGH SHRI DHANRAJ KARAD
Adv. S P CHHAPIA
Respondent(s)
SUCHI INDUSTRIES LIMITED Advocate - A M BHATHENA
ASHOKUMAR MEHTA (DIRECTOR)
Adv. A M BHATHENA
MANJU ASHOKUMAR MEHTA (DIRECTOR)
Adv. A M BHATHENA
SHETAL MEHTA (DIRECTOR)
Adv. A M BHATHENA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 13-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 06-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 10-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 and various sections of the BIS Act 2016 for operating an unlicensed business and producing substandard goods. Each accused was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹15,000 (or ₹60,000 in aggregate), with an additional 10 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused under IPC Section 275 and various sections of the BIS Act 2016 for operating an unlicensed business and producing substandard goods. Each accused was sentenced to pay a fine of ₹15,000 (or ₹60,000 in aggregate), with an additional 10 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts