SADEK GULAMMAHMAD PAREKH PROPRIETOR OF PAREKH PUMP STORE vs SURESHBHAI KHIMAJIBHAI SINGAL PROPRIETOR OF D.N.ENGINEERING COMPONY — 1839/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR090021562024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1839/2024
Filing Date
24-06-2024
Registration No
1839/2024
Registration Date
24-06-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, PALSANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SADEK GULAMMAHMAD PAREKH PROPRIETOR OF PAREKH PUMP STORE
Adv. N J MODI
Respondent(s)
SURESHBHAI KHIMAJIBHAI SINGAL PROPRIETOR OF D.N.ENGINEERING COMPONY
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 02-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 29-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court dismissed the complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the accused due to the complainant's failure to establish the accused's correct address despite 18 months of proceedings and multiple opportunities. The court found that without a valid address, the case could not proceed, and considering the complainant's repeated absence, it was appropriate to dismiss the complaint and acquit the accused (Mohammad Sureshbhai Khimjibhai) of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court dismissed the complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the accused due to the complainant's failure to establish the accused's correct address despite 18 months of proceedings and multiple opportunities. The court found that without a valid address, the case could not proceed, and considering the complainant's repeated absence, it was appropriate to dismiss the complaint and acquit the accused (Mohammad Sureshbhai Khimjibhai) of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts