SADEK GULAMMAHMAD PAREKH PROPRIETOR OF PAREKH PUMP STORE vs SURESHBHAI KHIMAJIBHAI SINGAL PROPRIETOR OF D.N.ENGINEERING COMPONY — 1839/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR090021562024

Filing Number

1839/2024

Filing Date

24-Jun-2024

Registration No

1839/2024

Registration Date

24-Jun-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, PALSANA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SADEK GULAMMAHMAD PAREKH PROPRIETOR OF PAREKH PUMP STORE

    Adv. N J MODI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURESHBHAI KHIMAJIBHAI SINGAL PROPRIETOR OF D.N.ENGINEERING COMPONY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court dismissed the complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the accused due to the complainant's failure to establish the accused's correct address despite 18 months of proceedings and multiple opportunities. The court found that without a valid address, the case could not proceed, and considering the complainant's repeated absence, it was appropriate to dismiss the complaint and acquit the accused (Mohammad Sureshbhai Khimjibhai) of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 29-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 26-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 07-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 08-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 18-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 25-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 16-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 10-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 07-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 04-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 12-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 21-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 21-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 01-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 03-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 13-Dec-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 08-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 04-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 06-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 16-Aug-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 26-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 24-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1839/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court dismissed the complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the accused due to the complainant's failure to establish the accused's correct address despite 18 months of proceedings and multiple opportunities. The court found that without a valid address, the case could not proceed, and considering the complainant's repeated absence, it was appropriate to dismiss the complaint and acquit the accused (Mohammad Sureshbhai Khimjibhai) of the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case