PROP. OF ISHA CREATION IT IS HITESHBHAI SHAMJIBHAI VALANI vs PROP. OF KHWAHISH CREATION IT IS BHAVESH JITENDRA PANWALA Advocate - M G PIMPALISAKAR — 863/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR090010902025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

864/2025

Filing Date

22-05-2025

Registration No

863/2025

Registration Date

22-05-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, PALSANA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

PROP. OF ISHA CREATION IT IS HITESHBHAI SHAMJIBHAI VALANI

Adv. B C SAVALIYA

Respondent(s)

PROP. OF KHWAHISH CREATION IT IS BHAVESH JITENDRA PANWALA Advocate - M G PIMPALISAKAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

13-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

19-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The court dismissed the criminal complaint (under Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138) filed against the accused because the complainant failed to appear in court and did not provide a valid address for service of summons despite multiple opportunities. Invoking CrPC Section 256 and BNS Section 279, the court ordered: (1) dismissal of the complaint, (2) acquittal of the accused, and (3) no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the criminal complaint (under Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138) filed against the accused because the complainant failed to appear in court and did not provide a valid address for service of summons despite multiple opportunities. Invoking CrPC Section 256 and BNS Section 279, the court ordered: (1) dismissal of the complaint, (2) acquittal of the accused, and (3) no order on costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, PALSANA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case