HAREKRISHNA RATNAKAR JENA vs NEW GOLDEN CULTIVATORS LLP — 494/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR090006432024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
494/2024
Filing Date
14-03-2024
Registration No
494/2024
Registration Date
14-03-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, PALSANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HAREKRISHNA RATNAKAR JENA
Adv. H G NAYKA
Respondent(s)
NEW GOLDEN CULTIVATORS LLP
URVESHKUMAR JAYANTILAL DHODI DIRECTOR OF NEW GOLDEN CULTIVATORS LLP,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 29-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 01-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 11-11-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the criminal case against the accused, finding insufficient evidence to proceed. The court held that the accused cannot be held responsible under Section 34 IPC as there was no clear conspiracy or common intention established, and the allegations of criminal intimidation could not be substantiated beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the criminal case against the accused, finding insufficient evidence to proceed. The court held that the accused cannot be held responsible under Section 34 IPC as there was no clear conspiracy or common intention established, and the allegations of criminal intimidation could not be substantiated beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts