VIKASHBHAI GULABBHAI PATEL vs CHIKHALE SAMARTH ALKESH Advocate - P P TIWARI — 374/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence Of Prosecution. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR090004722026
Filing Number
374/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
374/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, PALSANA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Last updated 31-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VIKASHBHAI GULABBHAI PATEL
Adv. H K SHINGALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHIKHALE SAMARTH ALKESH Advocate - P P TIWARI
-
2.JAINAM BROKING LTD(Name quashed from charge-sheet/complaint)
Adv. G M RAJGOR
Case History
-
05-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary: The court discharged Accused No. 2 (Jainam Broking Ltd) under Section 274 of BNSS, finding that the accused did not issue the cheque, did not sign it, and did not operate the bank account in question, thereby failing to meet the requirements under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The case against Accused No. 1 (Vikashbhai Gulabbhai Patel) was ordered to proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 374/2026
Summary: The court discharged Accused No. 2 (Jainam Broking Ltd) under Section 274 of BNSS, finding that the accused did not issue the cheque, did not sign it, and did not operate the bank account in question, thereby failing to meet the requirements under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The case against Accused No. 1 (Vikashbhai Gulabbhai Patel) was ordered to proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts