MAHEBUB BACHUBHAI HABSI vs DARSHANKUMAR RAMESHBHAI KALSARIYA — 2/2026

Case under Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Section 20,21. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJSR090001252026

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

08-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

08-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PALSANA

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 22-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 Section 20,21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHEBUB BACHUBHAI HABSI

    Adv. P I JODHPURIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DARSHANKUMAR RAMESHBHAI KALSARIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary The National Lok Adalat at Palsana disposed of Application No. 02/2026 by allowing withdrawal of the case on March 14, 2026. The parties reached a private settlement wherein the defendant paid the full claim amount, and the plaintiff no longer wished to pursue the matter further. No order on costs was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Order Of Execution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Order Of Execution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Order Of Execution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 18-Feb-2026

    Order Of Execution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Order Of Execution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The National Lok Adalat at Palsana disposed of Application No. 02/2026 by allowing withdrawal of the case on March 14, 2026. The parties reached a private settlement wherein the defendant paid the full claim amount, and the plaintiff no longer wished to pursue the matter further. No order on costs was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case