RAJESH LAXMIKANT YADAV POA OF SUNITA RAJESH YADAV PROPRIETOR OF RESHMA TEXTILES vs SHAHID KHAN PROPRIETOR OF SKY MOON EXPORTS — 22/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR090000512025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
22/2025
Filing Date
13-01-2025
Registration No
22/2025
Registration Date
13-01-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PALSANA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJESH LAXMIKANT YADAV POA OF SUNITA RAJESH YADAV PROPRIETOR OF RESHMA TEXTILES
Adv. A K VALANGAR
Respondent(s)
SHAHID KHAN PROPRIETOR OF SKY MOON EXPORTS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 05-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 08-12-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED | |
| 10-11-2025 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court held that the accused is liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque, rejecting the defense that the cheque was issued without proper authorization. The court found that the accused failed to prove the cheque was issued without knowledge and dismissed the case against the accused regarding criminal proceedings related to Section 138, while upholding liability under civil law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court held that the accused is liable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque, rejecting the defense that the cheque was issued without proper authorization. The court found that the accused failed to prove the cheque was issued without knowledge and dismissed the case against the accused regarding criminal proceedings related to Section 138, while upholding liability under civil law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts