Government of Gujarat vs AJAYBHAI SATYNARAYAN TIVARI Advocate - CPRC-299 — 669/2021
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 15th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR080006802021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
675/2021
Filing Date
09-01-2021
Registration No
669/2021
Registration Date
09-01-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
FIR Details
FIR Number
753
Police Station
MAHUVA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
AJAYBHAI SATYNARAYAN TIVARI Advocate - CPRC-299
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 06-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 09-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court discharged the accused, Ajayabhai Satyanarayan Tiwari, under Section 239 of the CrPC, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charge under Section 65-A of the Prohibition Act. The court held that witness testimony contradicted the seizure memo, no independent witnesses confirmed the seizure from the public place, and without technical expert evidence (FSL) or direct recovery from the accused, the prosecution failed to establish the link between the prohibited foreign liquor bottles and the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court discharged the accused, Ajayabhai Satyanarayan Tiwari, under Section 239 of the CrPC, finding insufficient evidence to prove the charge under Section 65-A of the Prohibition Act. The court held that witness testimony contradicted the seizure memo, no independent witnesses confirmed the seizure from the public place, and without technical expert evidence (FSL) or direct recovery from the accused, the prosecution failed to establish the link between the prohibited foreign liquor bottles and the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts