Government of Gujarat vs DHIRUBHAI DHAHYABHAI NAYKA Advocate - M C NAYKA — 502/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),117(2),352,351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR080005822025
e-Filing Number
06-05-2025
Filing Number
504/2025
Filing Date
31-05-2025
Registration No
502/2025
Registration Date
31-05-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
8
Police Station
MAHUVA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DHIRUBHAI DHAHYABHAI NAYKA Advocate - M C NAYKA
TEJASHBHAI SUMANBHAI PARBHUBHAI NAYKA
Adv. M C NAYKA
LILABEN DHIRUBHAI NAYKA
Adv. M C NAYKA
JAYSHRIBEN RAVINDRABHAI DHIRUBHAI NAYKA
Adv. M C NAYKA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 23-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 19-01-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 16-12-2025 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC No. 502/2025 The Principal Civil Judge Mahuva acquitted four accused individuals charged under IPC sections 115(2), 117(2), 352, 351(3), and 54, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Despite witness testimony and medical certificates, the court determined the evidence was insufficient to establish the alleged assault convincingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC No. 502/2025 The Principal Civil Judge Mahuva acquitted four accused individuals charged under IPC sections 115(2), 117(2), 352, 351(3), and 54, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Despite witness testimony and medical certificates, the court determined the evidence was insufficient to establish the alleged assault convincingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts