Government of Gujarat vs CHETANABHAI HASMUKHABHAI HALAPTI Advocate - R M HALPATI — 20/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR080000202026
e-Filing Number
02-01-2026
Filing Number
20/2026
Filing Date
02-Jan-2026
Registration No
20/2026
Registration Date
02-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, MAHUVA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 05-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
947
Police Station
MAHUVA POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHETANABHAI HASMUKHABHAI HALAPTI Advocate - R M HALPATI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Chetanabhai Hasmukhabhai Halapti The Principal Civil Judge at Mahuva acquitted defendant Chetanabhai Hasmukhabhai Halapti of charges under IPC Section 281 (rash driving) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177 and 184 (dangerous driving), finding insufficient corroborating evidence beyond police testimony to prove the alleged rash or negligent operation of a tempo vehicle that endangered public life on 14 July 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 20/2026
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Chetanabhai Hasmukhabhai Halapti The Principal Civil Judge at Mahuva acquitted defendant Chetanabhai Hasmukhabhai Halapti of charges under IPC Section 281 (rash driving) and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177 and 184 (dangerous driving), finding insufficient corroborating evidence beyond police testimony to prove the alleged rash or negligent operation of a tempo vehicle that endangered public life on 14 July 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts