JALARAM TYRE PROP. JAIVIK DIPAK PATEL vs NIKHILBHAI MUKESHBHAI PATEL — 3741/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR070047012025

Filing Number

3741/2025

Filing Date

30-Dec-2025

Registration No

3741/2025

Registration Date

30-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JALARAM TYRE PROP. JAIVIK DIPAK PATEL

    Adv. K U MISTRY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIKHILBHAI MUKESHBHAI PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary: The court permitted the complainant to withdraw a cheque-related criminal complaint after the parties reached an amicable settlement, with the accused making full payment of the cheque amount plus agreed compensation. The complaint was disposed of as withdrawn, and the accused was acquitted under Section 257 CrPC/280 BNSS, as the court found no reason to continue proceedings once the dispute was resolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 30-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3741/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court permitted the complainant to withdraw a cheque-related criminal complaint after the parties reached an amicable settlement, with the accused making full payment of the cheque amount plus agreed compensation. The complaint was disposed of as withdrawn, and the accused was acquitted under Section 257 CrPC/280 BNSS, as the court found no reason to continue proceedings once the dispute was resolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case