SHREE KHEDUT SAHKARI JIN LIMITED MADHI vs SANDIPBHAI PARBHUBHAI KHATRI SIGNETERY OF SETHIYA CAMICALS — 3738/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR070046952025

Filing Number

3738/2025

Filing Date

30-Dec-2025

Registration No

3738/2025

Registration Date

30-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHREE KHEDUT SAHKARI JIN LIMITED MADHI

    Adv. K S PRADHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANDIPBHAI PARBHUBHAI KHATRI SIGNETERY OF SETHIYA CAMICALS

  2. 2.SETHIYA CAMICALS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary In a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the court at Bardoli recorded a compromise agreement between the complainant and accused at the National Lok Adalat. The accused was acquitted upon recording the compromise, with directions to comply with its terms. However, if the accused breaches the compromise terms or the cheque bounces again, the complainant retains the right to pursue further legal action as per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 30-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3738/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In a cheque bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the court at Bardoli recorded a compromise agreement between the complainant and accused at the National Lok Adalat. The accused was acquitted upon recording the compromise, with directions to comply with its terms. However, if the accused breaches the compromise terms or the cheque bounces again, the complainant retains the right to pursue further legal action as per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case