SAHAYOG CO. OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED vs JAYESHBHAI NATAVARBHAI PANCHAL — 3718/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR070046652025

Filing Number

3718/2025

Filing Date

23-Dec-2025

Registration No

3718/2025

Registration Date

23-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAHAYOG CO. OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED

    Adv. N H PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAYESHBHAI NATAVARBHAI PANCHAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The Bardoli court allowed the complainant's application to withdraw a cheque bouncing complaint after the parties amicably settled the dispute, with the accused making full payment of the cheque amount plus agreed compensation. The court found the withdrawal was voluntary and without coercion, and accordingly acquitted the accused under Section 257 Cr.P.C./280 B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3718/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bardoli court allowed the complainant's application to withdraw a cheque bouncing complaint after the parties amicably settled the dispute, with the accused making full payment of the cheque amount plus agreed compensation. The court found the withdrawal was voluntary and without coercion, and accordingly acquitted the accused under Section 257 Cr.P.C./280 B.N.S.S. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case