UJJIVAN SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED vs ANSARI ARIF INTIJAMUDDIN — 437/2025
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJSR070046392025
Filing Number
439/2025
Filing Date
20-Dec-2025
Registration No
437/2025
Registration Date
20-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 03-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UJJIVAN SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Adv. V P GORI
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANSARI ARIF INTIJAMUDDIN
-
2.ANSARI SHAGUFTA ARIF
-
3.ANSARI INTIJAMUDDIN YAMIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court allowed Ujjivan Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged property in Bardoli, Surat, after the borrowers defaulted on a ₹17.10 lakh loan. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset within 90 days, relying on Gujarat High Court precedent that the magistrate need not adjudicate disputes on merits but must assist the creditor in possession-taking after proper notice and failed repayment attempts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Mar-2026
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Feb-2026
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Jan-2026
Process To Opponent
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 437/2025
The court allowed Ujjivan Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged property in Bardoli, Surat, after the borrowers defaulted on a ₹17.10 lakh loan. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset within 90 days, relying on Gujarat High Court precedent that the magistrate need not adjudicate disputes on merits but must assist the creditor in possession-taking after proper notice and failed repayment attempts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts