UJJIVAN SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED vs ANSARI ARIF INTIJAMUDDIN — 437/2025
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJSR070046392025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
439/2025
Filing Date
20-12-2025
Registration No
437/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UJJIVAN SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Adv. V P GORI
Respondent(s)
ANSARI ARIF INTIJAMUDDIN
ANSARI SHAGUFTA ARIF
ANSARI INTIJAMUDDIN YAMIN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT | |
| 17-02-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT | |
| 21-01-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT | |
| 09-01-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed Ujjivan Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged property in Bardoli, Surat, after the borrowers defaulted on a ₹17.10 lakh loan. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset within 90 days, relying on Gujarat High Court precedent that the magistrate need not adjudicate disputes on merits but must assist the creditor in possession-taking after proper notice and failed repayment attempts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed Ujjivan Small Finance Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged property in Bardoli, Surat, after the borrowers defaulted on a ₹17.10 lakh loan. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset within 90 days, relying on Gujarat High Court precedent that the magistrate need not adjudicate disputes on merits but must assist the creditor in possession-taking after proper notice and failed repayment attempts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts