Government of Gujarat vs HASAN KYUMBHAI MANSURI — 3267/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR070040652025
e-Filing Number
27-10-2025
Filing Number
3267/2025
Filing Date
25-Nov-2025
Registration No
3267/2025
Registration Date
25-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11214008251168
Police Station
BARDOLI POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.HASAN KYUMBHAI MANSURI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
Order
Summary: The court discharged the accused and cancelled the case due to the prosecution's failure to comply with mandatory provisions of the Prohibition Act. Specifically, the blood sample was not sent to FSL, Gandhinagar within 7 days as statutorily required, and essential forms were not submitted. The court held that non-compliance with mandatory procedural provisions warrants discharge to protect the accused's right to fair trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3267/2025
Summary: The court discharged the accused and cancelled the case due to the prosecution's failure to comply with mandatory provisions of the Prohibition Act. Specifically, the blood sample was not sent to FSL, Gandhinagar within 7 days as statutorily required, and essential forms were not submitted. The court held that non-compliance with mandatory procedural provisions warrants discharge to protect the accused's right to fair trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts