Government of Gujarat vs PAPPU MAHAVIR VARMA — 3081/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),98(2),116(B),81. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR070038682025

Filing Number

3081/2025

Filing Date

17-Nov-2025

Registration No

3081/2025

Registration Date

17-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214008251070

Police Station

BARDOLI POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),98(2),116(B),81
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 336(2),336(3),340(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PAPPU MAHAVIR VARMA

  2. 2.SIDDHNATH ALISE NAGENDRA BENIPRASAD

    Adv. C G SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Summary of Court Judgment The Bardoli court acquitted both accused in a prohibition (liquor smuggling) case due to insufficient evidence. Although 60,240 bottles of foreign liquor worth ₹60.24 lakh were recovered from the accused's truck, the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found critical weaknesses: the five witnesses (panchas) who signed the seizure memo provided no substantive support for the prosecution's narrative, the investigating officer's testimony lacked independent corroboration, and material evidence like FSL reports was absent. Applying the established principle that conviction requires solid proof, not mere suspicion, the court ordered both accused's immediate release and dissolution of the case under Indian Penal Code Sections 336(2), 336(3), 340(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 04-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 31-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 19-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 17-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3081/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Court Judgment The Bardoli court acquitted both accused in a prohibition (liquor smuggling) case due to insufficient evidence. Although 60,240 bottles of foreign liquor worth ₹60.24 lakh were recovered from the accused's truck, the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court found critical weaknesses: the five witnesses (panchas) who signed the seizure memo provided no substantive support for the prosecution's narrative, the investigating officer's testimony lacked independent corroboration, and material evidence like FSL reports was absent. Applying the established principle that conviction requires solid proof, not mere suspicion, the court ordered both accused's immediate release and dissolution of the case under Indian Penal Code Sections 336(2), 336(3), 340(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case