KRUSHI TRADERS PROPRITOR JAYSHUKHBHAI NANJIBHAI GADHIYA vs JIGNESHKUMAR DALUBHAI RABARI Advocate - S K BHATIYA — 2937/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR070036912025
Filing Number
2937/2025
Filing Date
18-Oct-2025
Registration No
2937/2025
Registration Date
18-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KRUSHI TRADERS PROPRITOR JAYSHUKHBHAI NANJIBHAI GADHIYA
Adv. V S PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.JIGNESHKUMAR DALUBHAI RABARI Advocate - S K BHATIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court acquitted the accused in this Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case after the complainant and accused reached a compromise settlement recorded by the court. The accused must comply with the compromise terms, but if they breach the agreement or the cheque bounces, the complainant retains the right to file a fresh application as per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2937/2025
The court acquitted the accused in this Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case after the complainant and accused reached a compromise settlement recorded by the court. The accused must comply with the compromise terms, but if they breach the agreement or the cheque bounces, the complainant retains the right to file a fresh application as per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts