KRUSHI TRADERS PROPRITOR JAYSHUKHBHAI NANJIBHAI GADHIYA vs DEVENDRABHAI BHAGUBHAI RABARI Advocate - S K BHATIYA — 2934/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSR070036882025
Filing Number
2934/2025
Filing Date
18-Oct-2025
Registration No
2934/2025
Registration Date
18-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 16-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KRUSHI TRADERS PROPRITOR JAYSHUKHBHAI NANJIBHAI GADHIYA
Adv. V S PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEVENDRABHAI BHAGUBHAI RABARI Advocate - S K BHATIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Summary In this Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint, the court acquitted the accused after the complainant and accused reached a compromise settlement recorded as Exhibit-09 in the National Lok Adalat. The accused must comply with the compromise terms, but if they default and the cheque bounces, the complainant retains the right to file fresh proceedings per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2934/2025
Summary In this Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint, the court acquitted the accused after the complainant and accused reached a compromise settlement recorded as Exhibit-09 in the National Lok Adalat. The accused must comply with the compromise terms, but if they default and the cheque bounces, the complainant retains the right to file fresh proceedings per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts