Government of Gujarat vs AFRAJ NASIRKHAN SHEKH — 2921/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 03rd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR070036732025

e-Filing Number

06-10-2025

Filing Number

2921/2025

Filing Date

15-Oct-2025

Registration No

2921/2025

Registration Date

15-Oct-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

03-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214008251102

Police Station

BARDOLI POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AFRAJ NASIRKHAN SHEKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Apr-2026

    Order

    Summary: The court discharged the accused and dismissed the case under the Prohibition Act due to the prosecution's failure to comply with mandatory procedural requirements. Specifically, the blood sample was not sent to the FSL laboratory within 7 days as required by law, and Forms B and C were not submitted on record. The court held that non-compliance with mandatory provisions warrants acquittal to protect the accused's right to a fair trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 25-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2921/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court discharged the accused and dismissed the case under the Prohibition Act due to the prosecution's failure to comply with mandatory procedural requirements. Specifically, the blood sample was not sent to the FSL laboratory within 7 days as required by law, and Forms B and C were not submitted on record. The court held that non-compliance with mandatory provisions warrants acquittal to protect the accused's right to a fair trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case