PRITI ALISE PRATIKSHA W/O DHAVALBHAI VASANTBHAI ALISE SOMABHAI PATEL D/O RAVIKANT RAMAJAS UPADHYAY vs DHAVALBHAI VASANTBHAI ALSIE SOMABHAI PATEL Advocate - S P CHAUDHARI — 453/2024

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 18,19,20,22. Status: Evidence Of Applicant. Next hearing: 01st May 2026.

Evidence Of Applicant Next hearing 01-May-2026

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSR070032642024

Filing Number

453/2024

Filing Date

02-Dec-2024

Registration No

453/2024

Registration Date

02-Dec-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 18,19,20,22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRITI ALISE PRATIKSHA W/O DHAVALBHAI VASANTBHAI ALISE SOMABHAI PATEL D/O RAVIKANT RAMAJAS UPADHYAY

    Adv. M S DWIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHAVALBHAI VASANTBHAI ALSIE SOMABHAI PATEL Advocate - S P CHAUDHARI

  2. 2.VASANTBHAI ALISE SOMABHAI VANAMALIBHAI PATEL

    Adv. S P CHAUDHARI

  3. 3.SUSHILABEN VASANTBHAI ALISE SOMABHAI PATEL

    Adv. S P CHAUDHARI

Case History

  1. 01-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 18-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 22-Aug-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: The petition for interim maintenance filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Sections 20 and 23) was partly allowed. The court found the applicant entitled to interim maintenance as she is unable to maintain herself, but rejected the full amount claimed due to insufficient supporting evidence. The opponent is ordered to pay ₹2,500 per month as interim maintenance from the date of the original application, with this amount to be set off against the final maintenance determined by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 31-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 23-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 19-May-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 03-May-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 19-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 01-Apr-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 10-Mar-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 07-Feb-2025

    Reply Of I.O.

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 03-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 02-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 453/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The petition for interim maintenance filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (Sections 20 and 23) was partly allowed. The court found the applicant entitled to interim maintenance as she is unable to maintain herself, but rejected the full amount claimed due to insufficient supporting evidence. The opponent is ordered to pay ₹2,500 per month as interim maintenance from the date of the original application, with this amount to be set off against the final maintenance determined by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case