Government of Gujarat vs PRAKASHCHNAD MISHRILAL KALAL Advocate - S K BHATIYA — 1338/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 287. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 07th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR070018202025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

29-03-2025

Filing Number

1338/2025

Filing Date

19-06-2025

Registration No

1338/2025

Registration Date

19-06-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

07th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214008250001

Police Station

BARDOLI POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 287
ESSENTIAL COMMODITITES ACT, 1955 Section 3,7

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

PRAKASHCHNAD MISHRILAL KALAL Advocate - S K BHATIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

07-04-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-01-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

09-01-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

09-12-2025

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

07-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court acquitted the accused Prakashchand Mishrilal Kalal of charges under IPC Section 287 and Essential Commodities Act Sections 3 & 7 for illegally refilling LPG cylinders, finding that the prosecution failed to follow proper statutory procedures for seizure and evidence collection. The court noted critical procedural violations including lack of proper notification under the Essential Commodities Act and insufficient documentary evidence to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused Prakashchand Mishrilal Kalal of charges under IPC Section 287 and Essential Commodities Act Sections 3 & 7 for illegally refilling LPG cylinders, finding that the prosecution failed to follow proper statutory procedures for seizure and evidence collection. The court noted critical procedural violations including lack of proper notification under the Essential Commodities Act and insufficient documentary evidence to prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case