SAHAYOG CO. OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED vs CHIRAGKUMAR MAHENDRABHAI PATEL Advocate - M S HALPATI — 667/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR070007602026

Filing Number

667/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

667/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAHAYOG CO. OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED

    Adv. N H PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHIRAGKUMAR MAHENDRABHAI PATEL Advocate - M S HALPATI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary In a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint, the court recorded a compromise between the complainant and accused at the National Lok Adalat on 14-03-2026, resulting in the accused's acquittal. However, if the accused breaches the compromise terms or the cheque bounces again, the complainant retains the right to file a fresh application as per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 667/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint, the court recorded a compromise between the complainant and accused at the National Lok Adalat on 14-03-2026, resulting in the accused's acquittal. However, if the accused breaches the compromise terms or the cheque bounces again, the complainant retains the right to file a fresh application as per Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case