SAHAYOG CO. OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED vs BHUMIKAKUMARI CHIRAGKUMAR PATEL Advocate - M S HALPATI — 665/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR070007582026

Filing Number

665/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

665/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 03-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAHAYOG CO. OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED

    Adv. N H PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHUMIKAKUMARI CHIRAGKUMAR PATEL Advocate - M S HALPATI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary In this Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (CC-665-2026), the court acquitted the accused after recording a compromise settlement between the complainant and accused at the National Lok Adalat on 14-03-2026. The accused must comply with compromise terms, but if they breach the agreement and the cheque bounces, the complainant may file a fresh application per Supreme Court precedent in K.N. Govindan Kutty Menon vs. CD. Shaji. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Plea

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 665/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In this Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case (CC-665-2026), the court acquitted the accused after recording a compromise settlement between the complainant and accused at the National Lok Adalat on 14-03-2026. The accused must comply with compromise terms, but if they breach the agreement and the cheque bounces, the complainant may file a fresh application per Supreme Court precedent in K.N. Govindan Kutty Menon vs. CD. Shaji. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case