ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPNY LIMITED vs SHANTOSH KUMAR PATEL — 80/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSR070007572026

Filing Number

80/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

80/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ICICI HOME FINANCE COMPNY LIMITED

    Adv. J J KALSARIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHANTOSH KUMAR PATEL

  2. 2.MAMTA DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court allowed ICICI Home Finance Company Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act for possession of a mortgaged residential property in Surat. The borrower defaulted on a ₹9,90,727 loan, and after proper notice under Section 13(2) was issued and remained unpaid, the court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the property within 90 days, with the lender required to deposit ₹15,000 for expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 80/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed ICICI Home Finance Company Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act for possession of a mortgaged residential property in Surat. The borrower defaulted on a ₹9,90,727 loan, and after proper notice under Section 13(2) was issued and remained unpaid, the court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession of the property within 90 days, with the lender required to deposit ₹15,000 for expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case