IDFC FIRST BANK LIMITED vs MAKANI NIMESH BHARATBHAI — 79/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSR070007472026

Filing Number

79/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

79/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IDFC FIRST BANK LIMITED

    Adv. H D MORADIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAKANI NIMESH BHARATBHAI

  2. 2.MAKANI RANJANABEN BHARATBHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court allowed IDFC First Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged flat (Flat No. A-310, Rayam Square, Bardoli) worth ₹14,15,000 loaned to the defendants, who defaulted on repayment and had their account classified as NPA. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession within 90 days after the bank deposited ₹15,000 toward administrative expenses, relying on Gujarat High Court precedent that magistrates need not adjudicate disputes or seek documents when processing secured asset possession applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 79/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed IDFC First Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged flat (Flat No. A-310, Rayam Square, Bardoli) worth ₹14,15,000 loaned to the defendants, who defaulted on repayment and had their account classified as NPA. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession within 90 days after the bank deposited ₹15,000 toward administrative expenses, relying on Gujarat High Court precedent that magistrates need not adjudicate disputes or seek documents when processing secured asset possession applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case