IDFC FIRST BANK LIMITED vs MAKANI NIMESH BHARATBHAI — 79/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSR070007472026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

79/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

79/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT, 2002 Section 14,

Petitioner(s)

IDFC FIRST BANK LIMITED

Adv. H D MORADIYA

Respondent(s)

MAKANI NIMESH BHARATBHAI

MAKANI RANJANABEN BHARATBHAI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

09-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court allowed IDFC First Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged flat (Flat No. A-310, Rayam Square, Bardoli) worth ₹14,15,000 loaned to the defendants, who defaulted on repayment and had their account classified as NPA. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession within 90 days after the bank deposited ₹15,000 toward administrative expenses, relying on Gujarat High Court precedent that magistrates need not adjudicate disputes or seek documents when processing secured asset possession applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed IDFC First Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged flat (Flat No. A-310, Rayam Square, Bardoli) worth ₹14,15,000 loaned to the defendants, who defaulted on repayment and had their account classified as NPA. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take possession within 90 days after the bank deposited ₹15,000 toward administrative expenses, relying on Gujarat High Court precedent that magistrates need not adjudicate disputes or seek documents when processing secured asset possession applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case