BANDHAN BANK LIMITED vs SUNIL RAGHUNATH GURAV — 76/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSR070007392026

Filing Number

76/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

76/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BANDHAN BANK LIMITED

    Adv. N J SAVANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUNIL RAGHUNATH GURAV

  2. 2.SONI SUNIL GURAV

  3. 3.BHARATBHAI KAILASH GURAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court allowed Bandhan Bank Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged property in Bardoli, Surat. The borrowers had defaulted on a ₹9,00,000 loan, and their account was classified as NPA after the bank issued a statutory notice under Section 13(2) on 20-09-2025, which remained unpaid. The court appointed a court commissioner to take possession of the secured asset (41.37 sq.m. property) within 90 days after the bank deposits ₹15,000 towards commissioner expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed Bandhan Bank Limited's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act to take possession of a mortgaged property in Bardoli, Surat. The borrowers had defaulted on a ₹9,00,000 loan, and their account was classified as NPA after the bank issued a statutory notice under Section 13(2) on 20-09-2025, which remained unpaid. The court appointed a court commissioner to take possession of the secured asset (41.37 sq.m. property) within 90 days after the bank deposits ₹15,000 towards commissioner expenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case