Government of Gujarat vs MITHUNBHAI JAGDISHBHAI SHAH — 608/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR070006902026

e-Filing Number

16-02-2026

Filing Number

608/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

608/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214008260072

Police Station

BARDOLI POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MITHUNBHAI JAGDISHBHAI SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused under sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2017, finding the accused guilty of drug-related offenses. The court sentenced the accused to simple imprisonment (duration not exceeding the minimum) and imposed a fine of ₹200, with 3 days additional imprisonment if the fine is not paid, considering the accused's early plea of guilt and applying the principle of proportionality of sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 608/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under sections 66(1)(b) and 85(1) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2017, finding the accused guilty of drug-related offenses. The court sentenced the accused to simple imprisonment (duration not exceeding the minimum) and imposed a fine of ₹200, with 3 days additional imprisonment if the fine is not paid, considering the accused's early plea of guilt and applying the principle of proportionality of sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case