Government of Gujarat vs HEMAL BHARATBHAI PATEL — 607/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSR070006892026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

607/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

607/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BARDOLI

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11214008260041

Police Station

BARDOLI POLICE STATION - SURAT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HEMAL BHARATBHAI PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Bardoli First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B, sentencing him to imprisonment until court rising plus a fine of ₹1,600 (₹1,500 + ₹100), with three days simple imprisonment as alternative if fine is not paid. The court reduced the sentence below minimum considering the accused's voluntary guilty plea, economic circumstances, and the principle of proportionality of sentences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 607/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bardoli First Class Judicial Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)B, sentencing him to imprisonment until court rising plus a fine of ₹1,600 (₹1,500 + ₹100), with three days simple imprisonment as alternative if fine is not paid. The court reduced the sentence below minimum considering the accused's voluntary guilty plea, economic circumstances, and the principle of proportionality of sentences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case